shienlai
shienlai
  • 3
  • 955 407
Wittgenstein: Philosophical discussion in Cambridge - Part 2
A dialogue between Wittgenstein, Russell and his wife (played by Tilda Swinton) about: Should Wittgenstein commit suicide because of a V-sign that has no philosophical meaning and apparently destroys Wittgenstein's language theory?
Переглядів: 149 232

Відео

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @manavkhatarkar9983
    @manavkhatarkar9983 2 місяці тому

    It hits different when u get to know that there were people who had had similar ideas to yours.

  • @scottan183
    @scottan183 3 місяці тому

    Wittgenstein claims that philosophers tend to "muddy the waters" yet he is guilty of what he tends to despise in other philosophers, probably one of the many reasons why he was a stern self loather.

  • @YeungMing007
    @YeungMing007 4 місяці тому

    I don't really get Wittgenstein's view often, even his basic pholosophy on language cultivating reality, I mean...isn't language created to convey and explain information existing in this world and furthermore? Language is merely just a tool for human conversation and imagination isn't it... anyone help

  • @SW-zx3op
    @SW-zx3op 7 місяців тому

    Fully Autistic... to the max.

  • @tonysandy7803
    @tonysandy7803 7 місяців тому

    'Fine words butter no parsnips.' 'The word is not the thing' (Zen). Language is communication within a species. Primitive language is simple sounds, indicating something like I stubbed my toe (Ah!). Language is group specific. The arrangement of sounds turns it into a code. If you don't have the language, you are left with gestures to communicate (visual signals / semaphore). If you interpret something from the emotional angle, rather than the intellectual one (words meaning what they say), it displays your negative state (fear and paranoia) as a positive state laughs things off as ultimately meaningless (Wittgenstein saying that the best book of philosophy would be a joke book).

  • @tyg715
    @tyg715 11 місяців тому

    man pls put the whole film.

  • @galenmurphy9903
    @galenmurphy9903 Рік тому

    Thanks milo

  • @DonVueltaMorales
    @DonVueltaMorales Рік тому

    If a dog can't lie, then why are we cautioned to "let sleeping dogs lie"? Riddle me that, Ludwig!

  • @bentleyvisser4072
    @bentleyvisser4072 Рік тому

    thought it was Wittgenstein himself when i looked at the thumbnail

  • @farrider3339
    @farrider3339 Рік тому

    Language spoken is 4 dimensional. Words are 2 dimensional. Thought, I have no clue how many dimensions it has. Not to speak why we think we think.

  • @xoCLO1D
    @xoCLO1D Рік тому

    WHERES ALL MY MILO/RAP FERREIRA HEADS AT??

  • @childintime6453
    @childintime6453 Рік тому

    Why is he quoting his books all the time :ddddd Also if Wittgenstein was really lecturing like this he must've been an annoying piece of shit

  • @shreyanshpateriya6709
    @shreyanshpateriya6709 Рік тому

    Was that old man i. Red Prof. Bertrand Russel ?

  • @adibzadeh
    @adibzadeh 2 роки тому

    This is a scene from Wittgenstein 1993 movie.

  • @JSwift-jq3wn
    @JSwift-jq3wn 2 роки тому

    When you bite into your lamb chop, shake your head and say...mm...delicious, you are speaking the lion's language.

  • @eben3357
    @eben3357 2 роки тому

    Funny that the dog and the pineapple pictured are both hybridised from nature, by humans. Darwin's darlings should have known this at least implicitly or from their comprehensive preparatory studies.

  • @proyectocms
    @proyectocms 2 роки тому

    A wonderful aspect of science is how its discoveries allow us to debunk myths, including the myth that animals cannot "lie." Today we know that at least some can do it, they can even complain when an exchange of goods with another animal is not fair.

  • @person-zg5mr
    @person-zg5mr 2 роки тому

    Will I fail to live in the world once I cannot enter the mind of a lion? And knowing his world

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 2 роки тому

    Good

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 2 роки тому

    Lol comedy sketch

  • @shaswatimishra
    @shaswatimishra 2 роки тому

    Rather we can say He is a complicated philosopher

  • @JustinBettany
    @JustinBettany 2 роки тому

    WHERE MY MILO HEADS AT 🙌

  • @martindutton1645
    @martindutton1645 2 роки тому

    I’m really attracted to LWs intensity of thinking or more specifically how he engages us with the processes of thought and how we can catch ourselves not really concentrating. I was put off when I first read the Tractatus decades ago because I didn’t or couldn’t grasp the mathematical symbols etc but I loved and felt extremely grateful (to him) for The Philosophical Investigations. He died relatively young (62) and I always wonder what else he might have written late in life.

  • @abhishekbaba8084
    @abhishekbaba8084 2 роки тому

    He missed the MEME era. 😶.

  • @aliriddick9428
    @aliriddick9428 2 роки тому

    Disillusioned man in some aspects I know i feel pain do not have a single doubt. Gets frustrated because he cant explain his silly ideas

  • @Leonardo-el6sq
    @Leonardo-el6sq 2 роки тому

    Cringe I do a little at least

  • @poe1583
    @poe1583 2 роки тому

    I've discovered him an hour ago and he's in my top 5.

  • @kushalrakhecha12
    @kushalrakhecha12 2 роки тому

    Who’s is watching in 2022?

  • @sumitwaghmare4711
    @sumitwaghmare4711 2 роки тому

    Philosophy is just The By product of Misunderstanding of languages. -❤️

  • @artmaknev3738
    @artmaknev3738 2 роки тому

    Wow he was seriously triggerd by the gesture!

  • @jeffersonirina2226
    @jeffersonirina2226 2 роки тому

    Here's applied philosophy to society. A cool art and philosophy channel. m.ua-cam.com/video/BIh8dkzfmU0/v-deo.html

  • @dnyaneshgadam5457
    @dnyaneshgadam5457 2 роки тому

    Love from India

  • @OH-pc5jx
    @OH-pc5jx 2 роки тому

    “nothing is hidden, everything is open to view” - could have been Lacan

    • @farrider3339
      @farrider3339 Рік тому

      Open to the sensory activities. But mind is never open. What we don't know We cannot talk about

  • @flambr
    @flambr 2 роки тому

    this video is a fever dream

  • @marshallzhu7470
    @marshallzhu7470 2 роки тому

    i don’t follow.

  • @seizethemovement9288
    @seizethemovement9288 3 роки тому

    His philosophy is too hard to understand.. To this present day itself he is underrated

  • @waltwhitman7545
    @waltwhitman7545 3 роки тому

    Wittgenstein rejected Cantor and tried to refute Godel's incompleteness based off the abstract alone. i do not believe he leaves the best legacy

    • @jesseolivarez7643
      @jesseolivarez7643 3 роки тому

      Don't judge him based on his failures. Judge him based on his triumphs

  • @ixmix
    @ixmix 3 роки тому

    sorry Ludwig, language is not life but a mean in life... without language there's life. Meaning can be understood/ transferred without words even.

    • @linkinlinkinlinkin654
      @linkinlinkinlinkin654 3 роки тому

      No. Without symbolism of some kind there is no way to even reach a position where meanings can be discussed. Without language logic falls to learned instincts and nothing else. Look at language deprivation experiments or feral kids.

    • @ixmix
      @ixmix 3 роки тому

      @@linkinlinkinlinkin654 May be i take Symbolism differently ... and 'Instincts' r much much better than than reasoning. Instincts helped humans in odds

  • @unknowndes1re
    @unknowndes1re 3 роки тому

    Don’t get it

  • @OrunitaVivi
    @OrunitaVivi 3 роки тому

    Don't get it

  • @stevelivingstone4616
    @stevelivingstone4616 3 роки тому

    What is this from?

  • @MiesAnthrophy
    @MiesAnthrophy 3 роки тому

    It would be funny to see Wittgenstein's reaction to this film about him. He liked to watch Westerns.

  • @liutasuk
    @liutasuk 3 роки тому

    Children have inkstinkt for language it not comes from culture.

  • @lucamaxmeyer
    @lucamaxmeyer 3 роки тому

    has this been colorized?

  • @freelancer9955
    @freelancer9955 3 роки тому

    The expostion of the topic, it seems, is more of E. Sapir than of L. Wittgenstein in the sake of better understanding here. The original scientific speech of L.Wittgenstein is more complex and hard to get for a person from the usual audience.

  • @revoltagainstfear
    @revoltagainstfear 3 роки тому

    Now every time I read W I have the picture of this actor. It is really funny. I liked W even more.

  • @viviliberton6196
    @viviliberton6196 4 роки тому

    Nowhere can I find any moving images of Wittgenstein. He died in 1951, there must be something out there?!

    • @historicwine1283
      @historicwine1283 4 роки тому

      Well, I can only speak for myself, but _I_ find what images we have of him very moving. ;)

    • @circolodellinconcludenza4369
      @circolodellinconcludenza4369 4 роки тому

      I never found any myself. I think it's kinda obvious, being the type of person he was, that avoiding the spotlight was something he always cared about

  • @dextrogyren
    @dextrogyren 4 роки тому

    What a delirium!

  • @ubelmensch
    @ubelmensch 4 роки тому

    Based

  • @amarug
    @amarug 4 роки тому

    its uncanny how much he actutally looks like wittgenstein